King James Bible believing (Ps. 12:6-7) Gospel of the Grace of God (Acts 20:24, 1 Cor. 15:1-4) Faith Alone (Eph. 1:7, 1:13, 2:8-9) Pre-Millennial (Rev. 19-20) Pre-Tribulation Rapture (1 Thes. 1:10) Mid-Acts Dispensational Right Division (2 Tim. 2:15, Eph. 3:1-9) anti-Darwinism (Exod 20:11, 31:17) one baptism (Eph. 4:5, 1 Cor. 1:17, 12:13) no signs for today anti-Charismatic (1 Cor. 13:8-13) against the sinner's prayer (John 9:31, Isa. 59:1-2) against the Flat Earth Hoax (Isa. 40:22, Job 26:7)
Pages
- Home
- Are you saved?
- Statement of Faith.
- King James Bible believer
- M.A.D. = Mid-Acts Dispensational
- Pre-Trib Rapture
- Baptism
- Miscellaneous
- KJV Sites
- Dispensational Sites
- Books
- Errors of Acts 28 Dispensationalism
- Sinner's Prayer = False Gospel
- Why I am not a Baptist
- The Hebrew Epistles
- More than one gospel
- What is right division? (2 Tim. 2:15)
- James White's "King James Only Controversy"
- Flat Earth falls flat
- Creation
- Gap Theory
- Campbellite “Church of Christ”
Monday, January 25, 2016
Richard Dawkins with foolish sign
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. (Ps. 14:1, 53:1)
There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. (Prov. 14:12, 16:25)
...prepare to meet thy God...(Amos 4:12)
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. (John 1:1-3, 3:36)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I find it bizarre just how far the Darwinists will go in order to substantiate their philosophy.
ReplyDeleteProminent biologist Richard Dawkins made this ridiculous statement during an interview with Bill Moyers:
"Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it has not been observed while it’s happening."
If you have not observed something while it was happening, then how can it rightly be claimed that the phenomena has been observed, at all? Talk about preposterous!
I've recently given some thought on the creation/evolution debate a few months back:
https://rationalchristiandiscernment.blogspot.com/2018/06/why-i-reject-darwinism-as-science.html